Re: [xmlblaster] are all messages stored in memory?

[Marcel Ruff <ruff at swand.lake.de>]

Mathieu Longtin wrote:

> So you are limited in the amount of queueing by system/virtual memory? Would
> it be possible to keep the header in memory and leave the payload in file
> storage?
>  
Yes, but this is not implemented, sorry.

You could work around this if your bigger messages only have a link
in the content pointing to a location with the new content data.

regards,

Marcel

PS: We have a message recorder (file based), which allows high performance
queueing on harddisk, but the merge with the update queue (which is RAM 
based)
is not done yet.