Re: [xmlblaster-devel] c++ test cases

[Marcel Ruff <mr at marcelruff.info>]

Martin Johnson wrote:

> Hi Marcel, Michele
Hi Martin,

> I have been working with xmlBlaster client lib tonight. I have come up
> against a couple of things.
> Would it be a good idea to keep the copied Global.cpp around if cpp.debug is
> true. It makes easier to debug, normal behaviour is to delete it.
Ok, i have fixed this.

> I have also had problems with test clients ( I know that it is a moving
> target, as I'm working out of cvs) Currently I'm working with TestFailsafe.
> It requires the server to be shut down. Fine, though the test case then
> falls over when nameserver query fails and assert is thrown, the code is not
> expecting the Nameservice query to fail.
>
> I am intending to work progressivly through these examples over the next few
> days so I could fix as they come up, I'm just letting you know if you want
> to do something about sooner than that.
>
> I notice that implementation is creeping into header files. All functions
> are then inline and bloat the library.
I have just compiled the C++ client code on Windows, Linux and Solaris 
(with TAO, MICO and ORBIX)
and it runs fine here.
I would like to freeze this code and make an xmlBlaster release now.
Could you please open a branch for your C++ enhancements so the main
branch is for bug fixes only.
As soon as you have finished your work we merge it back to the main trunk.

thanks

Marcel