Re: AW: [xmlblaster] about Log & Jutils

[Cyrille Giquello <cyrille at ktaland.com>]

Juergen Birkle a écrit:

> Hello Cyrille,
>
> > > If this behavior doesn't exists (setting logLevel for each LogDevice)
> > > perhaps there are some reasons ?
> > > If no reasons, perhaps I can try to add this feature., if jutils
> > > authors find this fine enough ;o)
> > >      
> > Juergen.Birkle at doubleSlash.de is the maintainer, probably
> > he can comment on it,
> >    
>
> I would prefer to keep it as it is.
> The reason for this architecture is a single point of configuration and an
> easy interface.
> The logging architecture allows to place more than one LogableDevice into a
> LogChannel, but the main idea was to place 2 different type of
> LogableDevices into it, e.g. a LogDeviceFile and a LogDeviceMail. And in
> this usecase there should normaly be the same information in the file as in
> the mail.
>
> But there is also an easy way to get what you want.
> Yust implement your own "LogDeviceFile???.java" and make it configurable.
> You can "name" this 2 different LogDeviceFile??? objects at construction and
> they read their LogLevels out of a global (static) Property object, so you
> could configure this two LogDeviceFile??? objects via parameter on startup
> or via a configuration file.
>
> Hope this solution is ok for you. If you have any further ideas how to
> extend the function of the log package without breaking the interfaces and
> keeping the usability as easy as possible please contact me.
Hello & Thanks Juergen.

Your idea is nice, I'll do that.

Else, there is a LogManager. What is it for ?
Why we can't call Log method (error, info ...) to it, then it will 
dispatch calls to each LogChannel ??

Cheers,
Cyrille

> Regars,
> Juergen Birkle
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature