AW: [xmlblaster] question about versions

["Konrad Krafft" <konrad.krafft at doubleslash.de>]

Hello Marcel,

when do you expect release 0.8?

Konrad

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org
> [mailto:owner-xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org]Im Auftrag von Marcel
> Ruff
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2002 12:18
> An: xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org
> Betreff: Re: [xmlblaster] question about versions
> 
> 
> Cyrille Cyrille wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hello,
> > few weeks ago I used cvs checkout -r BRANCH_0_7_9g xmlBlaster
> > after Marcel says use again the main branch.
> >
> > so this morning I checkouted out xmlBlaster from cvs :
> > $ cvs checkout xmlBlaster
> >
> > Then I did a build all, I can see version is 0.79dev in build log :
> >
> > [xmlblaster at k3 xmlBlaster]$ ./build.sh -DADD_XML_PARSER=false 
> > -Ddebug=off -Doptimize=on all
> > Buildfile: build.xml
> >
> > prepare:
> >     [echo]  OS_FAMILY     = unix
> >     [echo] Build timestamp = 07/24/2002 11:51 AM version = 0.79dev
> >
> > Is it a dev version ?
> > Is it enough for production ? 
> 
> The 0.79g stable is not maintained any more.
> All changes from 0.79g where merged to the main branch.
> 
> 0.79dev is as stable as anything else, since the testsuite passes.
> Cyrille, i would recommend to use the newest develop-cvs.
> You probably have an own testsuite for your problem domain
> which ensures production stability in your case.
> 
> There are some severe bugs still open:
> 
> 1. Dougs exception for volatile messages with his performance tests
> 2. Cyrille reported half a year ago that durable PtP messages where 
> delivered
>     again on restart
> 3. liuwen's whish that on reconnect the same session is reused
> 4. Finish implementing message timout handling (reported by liuwen)
> 
> I think when these topics are resolved we should release version 0.8
> Any comments?
> 
> regards,
> Marcel
> 
>