[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmlblaster-devel] How do I get rid of QueuePropertyBase.checkConsistency
Michele,
Thanks very much again, I really appreciate the help!
Last question - So is persistence/msgUnitStore/maxEntriesCache on a per
message basis or the entire memory? and going further, is the maxBytesCache
per message or in total? So if I have 2 GB to allocate to the Java process
running my server, would I set the maxBytesCache to nearly 2GB or should I
set it to something using a calculation like (maxEntriesCache *
maxBytesCache)?
The reason I ask this, is that my server sits on a machne with only
PostgresQL running on it as well (acting as the persistence store), and I am
free to set these as high as I might need, so I would like to set them as
high as I will ever need to improve performance.
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michele Laghi" <michele at laghi.eu>
To: <xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] How do I get rid of
QueuePropertyBase.checkConsistency
> Hi Matt,
>
> 500 should absolutely not be a problem.
>
> What you specify in queue/history/maxEntriesCache affects (only
> marginally) the RAM memory. queue/history/maxEntries only affects
> database resources so it should not be a problem setting it high (also
> 100000 should not be a problem).
>
> The parameters which most affect memory consumption are:
> persistence/msgUnitStore/maxEntriesCache and
> persistence/msgUnitStore/maxBytesCache
>
> since these contain the real "meat" of the messages. History queues,
> callback queues and subject queues currently only store references of
> the real content.
>
> Regards
> Michele
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Sargent wrote:
> > Michele,
> >
> > Thanks for the info, I do indeed need to keep every message that was
> > published available since when a client comes along and makes a
subscription
> > they will want all the old messages for that topic as well as any new
ones
> > that will come along. We would rarely need to hold more than 30
messages,
> > but there are cases where more than 100 will be published. Is there any
> > problem setting the history to 500 since we would rarely use that many?
> >
> > matt
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michele Laghi" <michele at laghi.eu>
> > To: <xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] How do I get rid of
> > QueuePropertyBase.checkConsistency
> >
> >
> >> Hi Matt,
> >> great that you found the problem. Of course if you need more entries in
> >> the history you can change this setting. The history queue however is
> >> only used in case you want messages which have been published before
you
> >> subscribed (or before you invoked a get).
> >>
> >> You can publish how many messages you want. The history queue will only
> >> keep the last ones (up to what you specified as maximum).
> >>
> >> Note that if you subscribed before a publish is made you can ignore the
> >> history queue since your messages will be hold by your (session
> >> dedicated) callback queue.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Michele
> >>
> >>
> >> Matthew Sargent wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK, I checked my .properties file and it had the correct settings, so
I
> >>> looked in my code to publish and I removed this code:messages:
> >>>
> >>> HistoryQueueProperty prop = new
> > HistoryQueueProperty(this.glob,
> >>> null);
> >>> prop.setMaxEntries(1000);
> >>> topicProperty.setHistoryQueueProperty(prop);
> >>>
> >>> and now the log says (which I assume is good):
> >>>
> >>> INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/05/31 12:42:53 | May 31, 2006 12:42:52 PM INFO
> >>> 21-XmlBlaster.SOCKET.tcpListener-Cad2Cap
> > org.xmlBlaster.engine.TopicHandler
> >>> administrativeInitialize: New topic is ready, history/maxEntries=10,
> >>> persistence/msgUnitStore/maxEntries=100000000
> >>>
> >>> I am concerned however, that 10 history entries is not enough, will I
> > still
> >>> be able to publish up to 100 messages on a topic?
> >>>
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Michele Laghi" <michele at laghi.eu>
> >>> To: <xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:02 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] How do I get rid of
> >>> QueuePropertyBase.checkConsistency
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Matt,
> >>>> its difficult to say what is wrong but my guess is that something is
> >>>> still wrong in your configuration or you have some persistent stuff
> > from
> >>>> previous runs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please make sure that you have in your ${HOME}/xmlBlaster.properties
> >>>> file the following:
> >>>> a)
> >>>> queue/history/maxEntriesCache = 10
> >>>> queue/history/maxEntries = ${queue/history/maxEntriesCache}
> >>>>
> >>>> (and only one time)
> >>>>
> >>>> b)
> >>>> delete in your temp directory (on *nix ${HOME}/tmp/) all xmlBlaster*
> > and
> >>>> client* files (this way you make sure you don't have old stuff
around)
> >>>>
> >>>> c)
> >>>> make sure the xmlBlaster.properties file you checked on a) is the one
> >>>> which is used. If you are unsure try to start the xmlBlaster with:
> >>>>
> >>>> java org.xmlBlaster.Main -queue/history/maxEntriesCache 10\
> >>>> -queue/history/maxEntries 10
> >>>>
> >>>> (all in one line)
> >>>>
> >>>> And if this does not help please send to me directly your
configuration
> >>>> file (xmlBlaster.properties) and a log file (possibly with -logging
> > FINE).
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Michele
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthew Sargent wrote:
> >>>>> I keep getting the following message, and I think I have configured
> >>> things correctly, but I still get it. Can anyone help?
> >>>>> [org.xmlBlaster.util.qos.storage.QueuePropertyBase.checkConsistency]
> >>> history maxEntriesCache=10 is bigger than maxEntries=0, we reduce
> >>> maxEntriesCache to maxEntries and continue.
> >>>>> Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>