Re: [xmlblaster-devel] ldbc

To: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlblaster.org
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] ldbc
From: Peter Bennett <bencom at bencom.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:57:17 +1200
Organization: Bencom Ltd
References: <8871DE936D4B0141910BA81C3E0E5C32171A74 at btcorp2.corp.btrade.com> <3F2655B5.1000603 at marcelruff.info> <3F29A5F9.7000802 at bencom.co.nz>
Reply-to: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
Sender: owner-xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1

Greetings

I have just sucessfully started up xmlBlaster with
MySQL through the ldbc abstraction layer.

I have not run any tests suites on anything yet...

Just to the point of xmlBlaster starting up without error
and confirming that the database tables are created and
contain valid data.

I am not sure where to go to from here...

There is one issue that needs addressing.

I will look further into the uniqueId (dataId)
overflow under postgres tomorrow.

Comments/suggestions welcome :)

I think the ldbc abstraction layer is a real possibility.

Regards

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xmlblaster-devel] ldbc
  - From: Michele Laghi <laghi at swissinfo.org>

References:
- [xmlblaster-devel] Does anyone know of any issues with the C SOCKET library?
  - From: "Dmitriy Kolasnikov" <dkolasnikov at btrade.com>
- Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Does anyone know of any issues with the C SOCKET library?
  - From: Marcel Ruff <mr at marcelruff.info>
- [xmlblaster-devel] ldbc
  - From: Peter Bennett <bencom at bencom.co.nz>