[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmlblaster] c++ client handle leak ?

Quartier, Nicolas wrote: 
Hi Marcel,

I think it are thread handles, but I'm not sure.
I saw the number of handles increasing initialy with the task manager.

Now I'm using boundschecker. At program termination a lot of resource leaks
are reported in pthreadVC.dll. But for the rest I'm not getting much information about it.
Next to this boundschecker also reports a memory leak of 32 bytes for every call:
"requestInfoP = xb->postSendEvent(&requestInfo, exception);"
on line 566 in xmlblasterconnectionunparsed.c
According to boundschecker the memory is allocated in pthreadVC.dll 

Could you please try to set

 -dispatch/callback/plugin/socket/multiThreaded false

and check in BoundsChecker if the handle leak disappears?
(true: Every callback call is a separate thread (the update() function).
 Like this you can call methods like publish() or subscribe() from within the update() call)

I would highly recommend to update to the current subversion release
since we have fixed some C/C++ bugs since release 0.91, see
http://www.xmlblaster.org/xmlBlaster/CHANGES

thanks,

Marcel

I also used process explorer.
In process explorer I see the handle count increasing, but the handle itself is not added
to the list of handles.

Kind regards,
Nicolas.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org
[mailto:owner-xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org]On Behalf Of Marcel Ruff
Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2004 16:01
To: xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster] c++ client handle leak ?


Quartier, Nicolas wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > I'm writing a c++ client using XB library 0.91 on win 2000.
 > The client connects to the server using sockets.
 > Does anyone know of a handle leak in the client?
 > Because everytime the client pings the server,
 > the number of handles of my client program is increased with 4.
 > The memory usage and the number of threads are stable though.
 >
 > Maybe I'm something wrong ?

File descriptor handles or socket specific handles?
How do you measure the consumed handles?

thanks

Marcel

 >
 >
 > Thanks and kind regards,
 > Nicolas.
 > - - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - -
 > Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is
 > privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the
 > addressee(s) named above and others who have been specifically
 > authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
 > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
 > message and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. The company accepts
 > no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
 > email. Furthermore, the company does not warrant a proper and complete
 > transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any
 > delays. If you have received this message in error, please contact the
 > sender and delete the message. Thank you.
 >


--
http://www.xmlBlaster.org
- - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - -
Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Furthermore, the company does not warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any delays. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. Thank you.



--
http://www.xmlBlaster.org