[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmlblaster] Queue and starving
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:58:43 +0100 Michele Laghi <laghi at swissinfo.org> wrote:
ML> Ciao Michele,
ML> in fact there is no mechanism to avoid such "starving" of low priority
ML> messages. I believe it is a correct behaviour to priorize high
ML> messages. If there are no free resources available to sent all
ML> then it is correct to hold back low priority messages.
ML> Of course you could discuss the fact that messages which are in the
ML> queue since a long time become a higher priority but this is a
ML> behaviour (you could have other such behaviours) which could be solved
ML> with a specific plugin.
Yes, I thought about that.
Some time based or 'number of fetch' operations based mechanism could be
implemented which increases the priority of the messages still in the
Michele Ravani Michele.Ravani at swissonline.ch
"Those who live hoping, die singing" My Gran