AW: [xmlblaster] Logging

[<Michele.Laghi at swisscom.com>]

Would it make sense to have a logging interface defined ?
Then the user could attach a certain log implementation (a simple wrapper class to for example log4j or whatever) by defining it in the config file or on the command line. This way it would be easy for the user to integrate in the log which she/he is normally using. As a default the current log implementation would be used.

Saluti
Michele


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Marcel Ruff [mailto:ruff at swand.lake.de]
> Gesendet am: Freitag, 23. August 2002 16:33
> An: xmlblaster at server.xmlBlaster.org
> Betreff: Re: [xmlblaster] Logging
> 
> David Kerry wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >A quick question for the developers...
> >
> >Are there any plans to move to a log4j logging environment in
> >xmlBlaster?
> >
> I also often thought about porting to log4j, is anybody 
> willing to do this?
> 
> >The existing logging system works, but is somewhat restrictive,
> >can't be tuned easily (how do I get rid of the colour on the
> >log-level tags in the output, for example?) and missing some
> >
> The colors only show up on UNIX xterms and are nice to see errors.
> In log files or windows no escape sequences are used.
> 
> >critical features for a production system (ie: rolling log files).
> >
> Rolling log file is supported.
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
>