Re: [xmlblaster] xmlBlaster with bidirectional GIOP

[Marcel Ruff <ruff at swand.lake.de>]

Konrad Krafft wrote:

> Hello,
>
> does anybody know, whether it is possible to use bidirectional GIOP
> via xmlBlaster.
>
> I have the problem that xmlBlaster use an extra Socket for the
> callback(-server).
> the bidirectional GIOP which is implemented in JacORB 1.4b4 should solve
> this problem
> and allows that the callback reuses a socket which has been initialized from
> the client. (Don't know how this work's???).
> Property in jacorb.properties:
> org.omg.PortableInterceptor.ORBInitializerClass.bidir_init=org.jacorb.orb.co
> nnection.BiDirConnectionInitializer
>
> My question is:
> Is it possible to use this feature with xmlBlaster?
Just copy the new jacorb.jar to xmlBlaster/lib/jacorb.jar

If the xmlBlaster testuite passes, you can commit the new jacorb
to xmlBlaster.org-cvs.

Our SOCKET protocol addresses exactly this issue as well.
Try

 java -jar lib/xmlBlaster.jar

and

 java -cp lib/xmlBlaster.jar HelloWorld4 -client.protocol SOCKET 
-socket.debug 2

The callbacks are routed through the same socket as the requests.
This way you can tunnel firewalls.
If you need to tunnel proxies as well, try to setup httptunnel
to tunnel SOCKET through any number of firewalls/proxies.
See
http://www.xmlBlaster.org/xmlBlaster/doc/requirements/protocol.socket.html

regards,

Marcel

> How is the configuration for the xmlBlaster?
> Does this work with Appligator? (Possibly this question should addressed to
> the jacorb mailing list).
The Appligator is currently not maintained at jacorb.org, it is buggy
a unusable a.f.a.i.k.

> Thanks in advance for help or discussion.
>
> Konrad.
>
>
>