> I have made tests some month ago on a double 1.1 MHz server > having 1200 > msgs/sec > (none durable) with one publisher and 5 subscribers (all of them > receiving the 1200 msg/sec). The publisher and subscribers > where running on two other hosts. > The xmlBlaster server had a CPU load of 40% with this scenario. > (The publisher was adjusted to send 1200 msg/sec). All in all, this doesn't sound too far off my non-durable tests. I'm using 10 publishers and 1 subscriber and I think the single subscriber acts as a bottleneck. I've also noticed that you use JRockit, which I think is faster than the standard Sun JVM. I also haven't tuned. > Could you post your test code, so we can check why the CPU has > nothing to do in you case? Here 'tis.
Attachment:
xmlBlaster-benchmarks.zip
Description: Binary data