[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmlblaster-devel] cluster load balance doed need think about PtP model?

To: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] cluster load balance doed need think about PtP model?
From: Marcel Ruff <mr at marcelruff.info>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:49:28 +0200
In-reply-to: <6926d48b050810195459988501 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <6926d48b050810195459988501 at mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
Sender: owner-xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716)

Winc Lee wrote:

>Dear Sir：
>    I read the requirement of cluster. cluster load balance does
>need think about PtP model? I cann't understand it.
>
>    Thank you for replying.
>
>
>Best Regards
>
>  
>
Hi Winc,

xmlBlaster only supports reliable master/slave operation.
If you need to connect huge amounts of clients this
master/slave can be easily used to distribute the load.

Regards,

Marcel

References:
- [xmlblaster-devel] cluster load balance doed need think about PtP model?
  - From: Winc Lee <winc.com at gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [xmlblaster-devel] cluster load balance doed need think about PtP model?
Next by Date: [xmlblaster-devel] Large-scale File issue socket and memory
Previous by thread: [xmlblaster-devel] cluster load balance doed need think about PtP model?
Next by thread: [xmlblaster-devel] Large-scale File issue socket and memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread