[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[xmlblaster-devel] Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]

To: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlblaster.org
Subject: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
From: Peter Bennett <bencom at bencom.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:57:02 +1300
References: <3FBAB55D.1020102 at swissinfo.org>
Reply-to: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
Sender: owner-xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1

Greetings

Fixed the peek bug by seperating the sql into two statements...

I am not sure whether the problem is a feature or bug in ldbc.

This is probably not ideal and I will do some research and maybe write a simple class to test sql against ldbc.

Regards

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
  - From: Michele Laghi <laghi at swissinfo.org>

References:
- [xmlblaster-devel] [Fwd: Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
  - From: Michele Laghi <laghi at swissinfo.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] [Fwd: Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
Next by Date: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
Previous by thread: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] [Fwd: Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
Next by thread: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: [xmlblaster] Ldbc]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread