Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Unifying property names #3 - COMMENT

[Cyrille Giquello <cyrille at ktaland.com>]

cyrille prefer 'path' because very simple to remember syntax.
effectivly , I don't use xpath every day, so it's hard for my brain to 
remember it ;o)

Regards & Cheers,
cyrille

Marcel Ruff a écrit:

> Hi,
>
> probably the SML variant [3]:
>
>  path:queue/cb/maxEntries=1000
>  path:/xmlBlaster/node/heron/client/joe/session/2/queue/cb/maxEntries=1000 
>
>
> and XPath variant [4]:
>
> xpath://queue[ at id='cb']/maxEntries=1000
> xpath:/xmlBlaster/node[ at id='heron']/client[ at id='joe']/session[ at id='2']/maxEntries=1000 
>
>
> could be marked with the protocol (path: or xpath:), they can be 
> transformed
> to each other easily,
> replace e.g. "[ at id='joe']" to "/joe" and vice versa.
>
> So we could use the 'path:' variant for xmlBlaster.properties and
> command line and telnet notation and the 'xpath:' variant for an XPath 
> access.
>
> waiting for more votes .....
>
> Marcel
>
> .

--
------------------------------------
   Cyrille Giquello  at  Ktaland
   Web : http://Ktaland.com/
   E-mail : cyrille at ktaland.com
   Tel : + 33 (1) 49 17 40 93
------------------------------------