Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Connections/CallbackServer/Subscriptions

[Heinrich Götzger <Heinrich.Goetzger at exploding-systems.de>]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Marcel Ruff wrote:

> Peter Antman wrote:
>
> >Some initial finding on a stress test wich tests
> >a) Many subscribers in one connection.
> >b) Many subscribers with one connection each.
> >
> >Here are the first result with 500 subscriptions ;-)
> >
> >Server memory per subscription consumed
> >             IOR	       SOCKET			RMI			XMLRPC
> >       oneCon  manyCon	       oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon
> >100    2631    27484
> >500    1785    26602		1081	18346		1041	22658		452	-
> >
> Strange, the oneCon should be more or less similar for each protocol.
> Did you run gc() three, four times (wiht a sleep(1000L) inbetween)
> before calculating?
>
> >
> >Logins/sec
> >	     IOR		SOCKET			RMI			XMLRPC
> >       oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon
> >100    124     2
> >500    142     2		7	0		167	2		99	-
> >
> >
> What is measured here??
>
> >Message/second updated
> >              IOR	       SOCKET			RMI			XMLRPC
> >       oneCon  manyCon	       oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon		oneCon  manyCon
> >100    35     27
> >500    20     2			11	0		21	2		-	-
> >
> What is the error with XmlRpc? Is the callback port occupied?
>
> Why has SOCKET 0? Did it fail?
>
> Are clients running in same JVM or on same computer in different process?
>
> >
> >
> >Pretty interesting. The XMLRPC did not run at all. And the most
> >effective seems to actully be to have many subscriptions on one Corba
> >connections, with RMI as a competitor. I will do larger test, the just
> >take sooooo long to complete.
> >
> When you have finished your tests are you willing to donate the results
> into performance.html on our homepage?
Would be very interesting to have the test routines/classes as well.

Greetings

Heinrich


>
> thanks
>
> Marcel
>
> >
> >//Peter
> >
> >
> >
>
>