Re: AW: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: Browser callbacks with XMLBlaster

[Marcel Ruff <ruff at swand.lake.de>]

Michele.Laghi at swisscom.com wrote:

> I think that having an own server and an own homepage is always an advantage. Anyway SourceForge is centralized and always a good page on which to start searching for Open Source projects. For that reason I think it would be a good idea to be present there too (for example JBoss has its own page and is present on SourceForge too). So I personally would prefere to keep our project where it is but at the same time publish and make it available on SourceForge.
If somebody is willing to do it, it is possibly a good idea.
I heared Sourceforge has a compile farm with all OS you can think of
this would be nice to test our C++ clients.
Probably they even have some Windows boxes which i never
could test on :-)

Saluto
Marcel

> Saluti
> Michele
>
>
>  
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Heinrich Götzger [mailto:goetzger at gmx.net]
> > Gesendet am: Freitag, 9. August 2002 10:53
> > An: xmlblaster-devel at server.xmlBlaster.org
> > Betreff: Re: [xmlblaster-devel] Re: Browser callbacks with XMLBlaster
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Marcel Ruff wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Ben Cox wrote:
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > Also, would you ever considered moving the project to an 
> > > >        
> > open source
> >    
> >
> > > > development server like Sourceforge?  I suspect that both usage and
> > > > the active participation of other developers would increase.
> > > >        
> > > What do the others on this mailing list think about Sourceforge?
> > > Currently i like our solution but probably i'm wrong.
> > >
> > >      
> > What would be the benefit of moving to SourceForge in 
> > oppoosite to have
> > the server like it is?
> >
> > I like our solution as well. We propose distributed systems, so
> > why don't provide it in a distributed manner?
> >
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Heinrich
> > --
> > http://www.xmlBlaster.org
> >
> >
> >    
>
>
>