[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preferred method for building source?
Brett Palmer wrote:
> Hey all,
> What is the preferred method to build the source for xmlBlaster? From the
> root of the source tree there appears to be three different ways to build
> the source.
> 1. build.sh (or build.bat)
> 2. make all
> 3. ant
> I have had the most success with just using the Makefile and running "make
> all". But it looks like this method rebuilds the whole source even when
> only one class has changed. I can review the Makefiles a little more, but
> if anyone has any quick suggestion I would appreciate it.
build.sh and ant is the same.
I currently use 'make all' on Linux, but 'ant' works as well.
'make all' works in every directory where a Makefile is,
compiling only the directory tree below the current directory.
I use it when hacking in one directory to compile locally only.
Makefiles check the dependency, so they should not recompile if not
PS: Is IBM JDK 1.3 running stable?
ruff at swand.lake.de